Comments on: Salesforce: JavaScript Remoting and Managed Packages http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/ A developer's view of Cloud Computing platforms & technologies. Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:11:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Visualforce Javascript Remoting,Namespace handling improvements in Summer’12 release | WikiCloud http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1993 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 15:15:37 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1993 [...] @WesNolte came with a nice solution to the problem, described here: http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/ [...]

]]> By: cwallatx http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1861 Tue, 22 May 2012 16:11:03 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1861 See http://developer.force.com/releases/release/Summer12/javascript+remoting+enhancement.

]]> By: cwallatx http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1858 Mon, 21 May 2012 18:06:02 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1858 Summer ’12 will help address porting VF remoting client-side invocation from DE orgs to installed orgs.

]]> By: Larry http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1791 Fri, 04 May 2012 13:02:33 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1791 Salesforce is working on it. It should be ready by Spring ’14

]]> By: @JohnDTheMaven http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1745 Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:20:59 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1745 Wes, Thanks for the post. I just ran into the same exact issue. A quick google of the issue and your post came up. You just saved me a ton of time. I appreciate it! Cheers!

]]> By: Wes http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1540 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:51:28 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1540 If there’s one meat worth saving it’s bacon! :)

]]> By: Shoby Abdi http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1539 Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:46:14 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1539 This truly excellent Wes. Saved my bacon :P

]]> By: CloudMike http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1522 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:22:36 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1522 Great tip, thanks Wes. Lets just hope that a Salesforce “fix” doesn’t break this work-around. :)

]]> By: Abhinav Gupta http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1517 Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:41:07 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1517 Great post Wes, we used something similar in our case where we have to use the same remoting code with and without prefix i.e. in DE org, QA and packaging orgs. This solution is very neat though !

]]> By: Wes http://th3silverlining.com/2012/02/26/salesforce-javascript-remoting-and-managed-packages/#comment-1512 Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:23:19 +0000 http://th3silverlining.com/?p=1001#comment-1512 I spoke to an SFDC guy in the forums and they said it’s a bug they’re working on. If you think about how the prefixing works automatically for VF code when moving between sandboxes it make sense for it to work for JS remoting.

Would be great to have more DE orgs that mirrored the packaging org, great idea :)

]]>